|
March 2006
This e-newsletter is intended to
keep you up-to-date on some of the latest SEL research and best
practices. The FCASEL ("Friends of CASEL") listserv
manages subscriber information. To
subscribe or unsubscribe, go to http://www.casel.org/listservs/index.php
or
send an e-mail to Cynthia Coleman at colemanc@uic.edu
with
“subscribe FCASEL” or “unsubscribe FCASEL” in the subject
line.
We
encourage you to share this information with others on your e-mail
list. If your e-mail does not support HTML formatting, you can read
this issue on our web site at: www.CASEL.org/listservs/enewsletters/e-news-mar06.htm
or request a text-only version from Cynthia Coleman at: colemanc@uic.edu.
In
This Issue: Focus
on Adolescents
- Spotlight
on Research: SEL and High School
Achievement: Self-discipline counts more than IQ; Which SEL factors
matter most? Social and behavioral characteristics predict
academic success; Policies and intervention address problem of
bullying; Teacher connectedness and risky behavior;
Service-learning and community connections
- Spotlight
on Practice:
Keeping kids in
school; SEL at the heart of school reform; Turning the tables:
teachers as students ~ and students teach about teaching; A
whole school turns out to build relationships ~ and student
success
- Spotlight
on Policy:
New York State mental
health/SEL policy 2006; Proposed federal
education budget for 2007; Anti-bullying Act of 2005; Policy
analysis for mental health in schools
- Resources: Helpful websites about
school reform; Revised educational policies, state-by-state;
Data/trends; What Works Clearinghouse new help desk; LSS
Partnership Series on Adolescents; Multimedia resource on High
Schools that Work; The adolescent brain
- New
Books
- Grants
- Conferences
From
CASEL's Leadership
In this
issue we turn our attention to the issue of the educational, social,
and emotional needs of high school students and the challenges
facing educators in helping students to succeed in high school and
beyond. Especially in the last year, a great deal of national
attention has been directed to these topics. The Gates
Foundation’s billion-dollar-plus investment in small high schools,
the National Governors Association’s call to action, and the
Breaking Ranks II high school reform model are among the most public
of the initiatives to improve high schools. Paths to reform and even
problem definitions are by no means clear, however. In recent weeks
articles in the American School Board Journal and Educational Leadership (www.asbj.com/evs/06/highschool.html
and “The Dropout Problem:
Losing Ground”, Paul E. Barton, in Educational Leadership
(Feb. 2006), Vol. 63, No. 5, pp.14-18 at www.ascd.org)
have described a worsening dropout “crisis.” This was followed
by a lead article in Education
Week titled “The Exaggerated Dropout Crisis,” which
estimates the African American student drop-out rate at closer to
25% than the 50% cited by other researchers (Lawrence
Mishel, Education Week, Mar. 8, 2006, www.edweek.org).
What is not in dispute is that many of our adolescents are hurting.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) latest
Youth Risk Behavior Survey reports that, in the previous 12 months,
almost 30% of teens “felt so sad or hopeless almost every day for two weeks or more in a row
that [they] stopped doing some usual activities,” 13% were in a
physical fight on school property, a third were sexually active, and
one in six had made a plan to attempt suicide. This crisis among our
youth has caught the attention of educators, scholars, funders, and
policymakers, who have offered various ideas and initiatives to
improve high schools and change the world around adolescents for the
better.
Solutions
are by no means clear. Tom Vander Ark, executive director of
the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s education initiatives,
summarized in Education Week last year what had been learned
so far in the nation’s largest high school reform effort, their
small schools initiative: “The biggest lesson learned to date? It
is even harder than we thought to create widespread improvement. My
father is a brain surgeon; this is more complicated.”
One
of the consistent threads running through the research on improving
adolescents’ circumstances and school performance, however, is
that social and emotional factors are a key to the solutions.
Whether we call it “personalization,”
“student connectedness,” “positive youth
development,” “student voice,” or SEL, there is a consistent
message in the research. It says that when students know there is an
adult in the school who cares about them (caring connection), have a
voice in the school’s affairs (opportunities for contribution and
responsible behavior), have a positive sense of their own talents
and ability to tackle challenges (positive self-awareness), and
learn to manage their impulses and complete school tasks
(self-management), they are far more likely to 1) literally show up
in school, 2) show up with their attention and interest, and 3)
succeed academically. In this issue you will learn about this
research, other resources on the topic, and strategies you can put
into practice to start seeing some of the same results among your
own students.
Mary Utne
O’Brien
Executive Director
Spotlight
on Research
SEL
and High School Achievement
Self-Discipline
Counts More Than IQ. In
a comparative study of over 300 8th graders, researchers
measured the influence of self-discipline and IQ on school success.
Results showed that highly self-disciplined adolescents outperformed
their more impulsive peers on every academic performance variable.
Self-discipline measured in the fall was a better predictor of gains
in academic performance over the school year than was IQ. The
researchers suggest that in a culture that emphasizes instant
gratification, building self-discipline may be the key to success in
learning.
Source:
Duckworth, Angela L., and Seligman, Martin E.P. (2005).
Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of
adolescents. Psychological Science, Vol. 16, No. 12, 939-944.
Which
SEL Factors Matter Most? In
another report, Theresa Akay examines two factors prominent in SEL
discussions: student
engagement with school and a
student’s sense of his/her own ability to handle academic tasks
(the SEL skill of self-awareness). She found that both are
significant predictors of school performance, and that of the two,
the latter—which she terms “perceived competence”-- is the
more influential in boosting achievement in mathematics and reading.
That is, students who are confident about their academic
competence—who feel they are up to an academic task—do better
than students who doubt their ability, even when actual ability is
the same for both. The study suggests that the earlier schools and
teachers begin to build students’ healthy self-awareness of
strengths and confidence in their ability to do well, the better
students will perform academically. See Student Context, Student
Attitudes and Behavior and Academic Achievement: An Exploratory
Analysis, MDRC (Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation),
2006 at http://www.mdrc.org/publications/419/overview.html
Social
and Behavioral Characteristics Predict Academic Success
A
longitudinal study of 576 students in the Pacific Northwest provides
evidence that school-based SEL programs that curb early
manifestations of antisocial behavior and promote school bonding and
social-emotional skills improve student academic achievement. The
researchers found that higher levels of school bonding and better
SEL skills in 7th grade strongly predicted academic
achievement in 10th grade. See Fleming, Charles B.,
Haggerty, Kevin P., Catalano, Richard F., Harachi, Tracy W., Mazza,
James, J., Gruman, Diana H. (2005). Do social and behavioral
characteristics targeted by preventive interventions predict
standardized test scores and grades?
Journal of School Health, Vol. 75, No. 9.
Policies and Intervention Address
Problem of High School Bullying
A
representative national sample of US teenagers surveyed last year
revealed that two-thirds have been verbally or physically harassed
or assaulted during the past year because of their perceived or
actual appearance, gender, sexual orientation, gender expression,
race/ethnicity, disability, or religion. The authors of this report
note that the pervasiveness of negative comments about gayness, for
example, challenges schools to enact anti-harassment policies and
teachers to establish a learning environment safe for all. See
GLSEN’s report From Teasing to Torment: School Climate in
America (2005) at http://www.glsen.org/cgi-bin/iowa/all/news/record/1859.html.
Teacher
Connectedness and Risky Behavior
Data collected from a sample of 550
adolescents in juvenile detention facilities was analyzed to explore
the relationship between their reported sense of connectedness with
teachers and their risk-taking behaviors. Those who reported less
teacher connectedness were twice as likely to use drugs, twice as
likely to be sexually active and to have sex while using drugs than
teens who felt greater connection. The researchers conclude that
school-based interventions that enhance the school environment,
particularly teachers’ skills and training to maximize the
effectiveness of their student interactions, may be an important
strategy for reducing risky adolescent behaviors.
Source:
Voisin, Dexter R., Salazar, Laura F., Crosby, Richard,
Diclemente, Ralph, Yarber, William, Staples-Horne, Michelle. Teacher
connectedness and health-related outcomes among detained
adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Health (Oct. 2005), Vol.
37, Issue 4.
Service-Learning
and Community Connections
We at CASEL often talk about service
learning as a wonderful opportunity for students to act on and build
their social and emotional skills—an important “action step”
of SEL. We were excited to read news of service-learning integrated
into an academic high school program in Hawaii, resulting in a host
of good outcomes: positive student academic outcomes and career
development, as well as greater attachment to the community, along
with benefits to the community and environment. Students rotated
through four different service-learning projects each semester.
Evaluation results showed that, compared to peers not involved in
service learning, the students engaged in service learning were more
likely to feel that they contributed to the community, were valued
by community members, had responsibility for the welfare for the
community, had pride in the community, and took action and made
changes in their community.
Source:
Yamauchi, Lois A., Billig, Shelley H., Meyer, Stephen,
Hofshire, Linda. Students outcomes associated with service-learning
in a culturally relevant high school program, Journal of
Prevention and Intervention in the Community,(2006), Vol. 32, pp.
149-164.
Don't
miss a research brief on SEL and Service-Learning is available
from CASEL, LSS, and ECS, Making the Case for Social and
Emotional Learning and Service-Learning (2003) at http://ecs.org/clearinghouse/44/04/4404.pdf.
Spotlight
on Practice
Keeping
Kids in School
The
Silent Epidemic: Perspectives of High School Dropouts,
2006, by John M. Bridgeland, John J. DiIulio, Jr., and Karen Burke
Morison, at http://www.civicenterprises.net/pdfs/thesilentepidemic3-06.pdf,
offers insights into reasons why students leave school early as well
as solutions to the dropout crisis. This innovative study went to
the former students themselves in pursuit of answers and found some
surprises. Only 35% of former students cited academic failure as a
major factor in dropping out (and most of these said that their
school hadn’t done all that they could to help them). The large
majority, however, identified social and emotional barriers to
continuing in school. They pointed to problems of engagement and
motivation, lack of caring relationships in school, and lack of
personal support. Building off these responses, the authors suggest
supports that can be provided within the school environment and at
home to improve students’ chances of staying in school:
- Improve
teaching and curricula to make school more relevant and engaging
and enhance the connection between school and work
- Improve
instruction and access to supports for struggling students
- Build
a school climate that fosters academics by increasing
supervision and classroom discipline
- Ensure
that students have a strong relationship with at least one adult
in the school
- Improve
communication between parents and schools
In
a separate but related report, Paul E. Barton examines the
statistics behind the failure to graduate, the factors that affect
the dropout rate (low-income and single-parent family, getting low
grades in school, being frequently absent, and changing schools),
and programs that successfully support students at risk of dropping
out. Providing support for vulnerable ninth-graders and one-on-one
interaction between students and adults throughout high school is
key. See The Dropout Problem: Losing Ground, in Educational
Leadership (Feb. 2006), Vol. 63, No. 5, pp.14-18 (www.ascd.org)
SEL at the Heart of School Reform
Numerous reports and articles have
appeared recently about school reform in middle and high schools.
Some support lessons CASEL has learned about implementation; others
identify structures that CASEL has also found to be valuable, such
as freshman academies and close teacher-student relationships. Three
valuable resources are:
Works
in Progress: A Report on Middle and High School Improvement Programs
(2005) addresses key
challenges in middle and high schools, such as literacy, violence,
prevention, and transitions. Programs are recommended, as well as a
commitment to faithful implementation, willingly executed, time for
success to grow, and support and engagement from the entire learning
community. Comprehensive School Reform Quality Center (AIR) (www.csrq.org/docs/WorksinProgressReport_web.pdf)
Breaking
Ranks II: Strategies for Leading High School Reform (2004)
and the just-released, Breaking Ranks in the Middle:
Strategies for Leading Middle Level Reform (2006),
are products of the National Association of Secondary School
Principals and the Education Alliance at Brown University. The
documents establish strategies and recommendations for high school
and middle level education to improve the performance of students
and better equip them for high school and beyond. Three core areas
of practice are emphasized as key to successful reform, and concrete
strategies for addressing each are provided. The core areas are:
- Collaborative
leadership and professional learning communities
- Personalizing
the school environment
- Making
learning personal: Curriculum, instruction and assessment
The
personalization strand in both books—defined as strengthening
relationships among people in the school community to improve
student performance—is simply different language for social and
emotional learning strategies designed to build student connection
and engagement. These excellent resources are available at http://www.principals.org.
Mosaic:
An EDC Report Series, Focus on High School (Fall
2005) focuses on the
challenge to revamp high schools so that more students graduate by
nurturing both the intellectual and social development of students,
building relevance and connectedness into the curriculum and into
training for teachers. (http://main.edc.org/Mosaic/Mosaic10/toc.asp
and http://main.edc.org/Mosaic/Mosaic10/introduction/asp)
Turning
the Tables: Teachers as Students—and Students Teach about Teaching
In
My Year as a High School Student, Educational Leadership (March
2006), Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 63-65 (www.ascd.org),
Deborah Waldron, a high school physics teacher, describes taking a
year-long freshman biology class. Apart from acquiring a newfound
appreciation of biology, she learned new ways to improve her
teaching by becoming more aware of the real pressures that students
experience:
- Give
students more time for creative projects
- Occasionally
use short, straightforward assessments
- Reinforce
ethics and clarify plagiarism
- Change
student seats often so everyone gets to know the whole class
In the Best Practices Club at
Lexington High School, (Massachusetts), students are trained to
critique classes. The idea of this collaboration between students
and teachers to create a better learning environment is spreading to
other schools across the country. To learn more, visit the Best
Practices website at www.bestpracticeslex.org
and read Ariela Rothstein’s article in Education Week (Feb. 8, 2006), Students as Coaches: One High School’s
Experiment in Using Students’ Perceptions to Help Teachers Improve
Instruction at http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2006/02/08/22rothstein.h25.html?querystring=Students%20as%20Coaches&levelId=1000.
The Boston Plan for Excellence, the
local education fund, set out to assess the quality of relationships
among faculty and students in Boston schools. Students were enlisted
as researchers and their findings about improving school climate are
published. Recommendations are to:
- Make
a serious effort to know every student well so they will feel
supported and motivated to learn
- Expose
students to role models and programs that help them recognize
their potential
- Create
opportunities for students to really learn about classmates’
cultures to help reduce negative peer interaction
- Create
a clean, well-maintained physical environment to help students
feel ownership of their school
To
read about the findings and the process in order to involve students
in your school, go to:
http://snipurl.com/bostonsurvey.
A Whole School Turns out to Build
Relationships ~ and Student Success
An ambitious pilot program in
Lancaster High School (TX) teams every senior with a mentor, who
might be a teacher or instructional aide, a secretary, or an
administrator. Mentors meet with their student at least once every
six weeks to discuss college plans, entrance exams, TAKS (the state
tests required for graduation), and opportunities for tutoring.
Already this year, 33% more students have passed the necessary TAKS
tests than last year, and the mentoring program is getting credit
for this; plans are being made to expand the program to other high
school grades. All Seniors in Texas High School Get Mentors, Sean
Cavanagh, in Education Week, Feb. 22, 2006 (www.edweek.org).
See Safe
and Sound: An Educational Leader's Guide to Evidence-Based Social
and Emotional Learning (SEL) Programs (http://www.casel.org/projects_products/safeandsound.php)
for information on a number of excellent SEL programs with high
school components, including Community of Caring, Lions-Quest Skill
Series, and Teenage Health Teaching Modules.
Practice
idea: For
the high school teachers among our readers who want to
"try" SEL, here's a suggestion. One way to personalize the
classroom and to promote social and emotional learning is to offer
choices from day one. First, choices convey that there isn't just
one way to meet a goal or complete a task, thus acknowledging that
every class exhibits a wide range of learning preferences, styles
and motivators. Second, choices encourage self-efficacy and
self-expression. Students get to say to themselves, "I chose to
do it this way and here's why." Third, providing more
opportunities for choice comes with the expectation of being more
personally responsible and accountable. And finally, offering
academic and behavioral choices invites cooperation, reduces student
resistance to learning, and minimizes adversarial relationships
between students and teachers.
Talk with colleagues and develop ways to offer students more
individual and group choices in areas including assessment,
test-taking, homework, what they want to learn more about, what they
want to learn how to do, the topics of study in a particular unit,
the sequence of learning units, the amount students need to read
each week, and procedures for how things are done in class. (For
more detailed ideas, see pages 46-48 and 103-105 in Partners in
Learning by Carol Miller Lieber (2002), published by Educators
for Social Responsibility.) If you try these suggestions and
want to tell us how things went for you and your students, we want
to hear about it! Write to Mary Utne O'Brien at muobrien@uic.edu.
We look forward to hearing from you!
Spotlight
on Policy
New
York State Mental Health/SEL Policy, 2006
Here in Illinois, we feel that the
Illinois’ Children’s Mental Health Act of 2003, which led to the
creation of SEL standards for all students, is something of a
miracle—a major benchmark in the education establishment’s
attention to SEL. So we are thrilled to report that legislators in
New York have proposed a similar act based on the Illinois
legislation. Proposed Bill A9649 would require establishment of a
children’s mental health plan and incorporation of social and
emotional development standards into elementary and secondary school
educational guidelines. http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A09649&sh=t
Proposed
Federal Education Budget for 2007
The President’s proposed education
budget for 2007 is 5.5% less than 2006, and would eliminate 42
education programs, such as vocational education, after-school
programs, Perkins Loans, career and technical education, school
counseling, and Safe and Drug-Free Schools through the reduction to
Title 1 grants by $3 billion. See http://www.stateline.org/live/ViewPage.action?siteNodeId=136&languageId=1&contentId=86486
for details. Public Education
Network (http://www.publiceducation.org/doc/press_releases/FY2006_Comments.doc)
contends that this proposed
budget undermines existing federal school reform efforts that have
instituted serious accountability measures. A state-by-state look at
educational funding can be found at http://www.nea.org/lac/fy07edfunding/index.html.
Anti-Bullying
Act of 2005
Building
on the safe school legislation already in place, the new proposed
bill (HR 284) requires schools and districts to include discipline
policies against bullying and harassment; establish complaint
procedures for students and parents; and annually notify parents of
new anti-bullying policies and procedures. (http://www.bullypolice.org/national_law.html)
Policy
Analysis for Mental Health in Schools
The
recent findings released in the SAMHSA report: School Mental
Health Services in the United States, 2002-2003 are given a
context in The Current Status of Mental Health in Schools: A
Policy and Practice Analysis, published by the UCLA School
Mental Health Project. Read the report at: http://smhp.psych.ucla.edu/currentstatusmh.htm.
Resources
Helpful
Websites about High School Reform
Center for Comprehensive School
Reform: www.centerforcsri.org
Comprehensive School Reform Quality
Center: www.csrq.org
Edutopia on High Schools: http://www.edutopia.org/highschool/
Wested Website on Secondary School
Improvement, Schools Moving Up:
http://www.schoolsmovingup.net/cs/wested/print/htdocs/home.htm
Revised
Educational Policies, State-by-State
All education-related policies
enacted by states over the past year are at your fingertips. Read,
for example, how states articulate Character Education Policy or
High School Drop-out Rates, at http://www.ecs.org/ecs/ecscat.nsf/Web2005All?OpenView&Count=-1
Data/Trends
The US Department of Education
reports that 73.9% of American high school students graduated in
four years for the class of 2002-03, with a range from 59.6% for
Washington, DC, to 87% for New Jersey.
See The Averaged
Freshman Graduation Rate for High Schools, from Common Core of Data,
2001-02, 2002-03, at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006601
for this and other useful data.
The Education Commission of the
States (ECS) regularly issues useful compilations and comparisons of
state policies and data collected on a wide variety of topics. To
view information about high schools, standards, requirements, state
data systems, and other related topics, go to:
http://www.ecs.org/ecsmain.asp?page=/html/educationIssues/ECSStateNotes.asp.
A
Profile of the American High School Seniors in 2004: A First Look
provides an array of demographic data and information about the
plans, expectations, and views of education from these recent
graduates of the American educational system at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006348.
What
Works Clearinghouse New Help Desk
Launched in January 2006 under the
auspices of the US Department of Education’s Institute of
Education, the Help Desk serves to provide policymakers,
practitioners, and researchers with practical, easy-to-use resources
to advance evidence-based education, particularly for program
implementation and evaluation. http://www.whatworkshelpdesk.ed.gov/
LSS
Partnership Series on Adolescents
LSS’s Partnership Series includes
four concise brochures about adolescence written for parents and
teachers. See “The ABCs of Coping with Adolescence” and “The
Four Ls of Building Adolescent Identity” at www.temple.edu/lss/partnerships.htm.
Multimedia
Resource: Discussion Guide and DVD of “Making Schools Work >
High Schools That Work”
This PBS Special aired in October
2005 and highlighted ways schools of all levels are addressing
school improvement by adopting attitudes and programs for change. http://www.pbs.org/makingschoolswork/sbs/hstw/index.html
A discussion guide is now available
free-of-charge; a DVD of the broadcast can be purchased.
They are designed to stimulate public discussion of effective
techniques and successful examples of school change. See the guide
and ordering information at www.pbs.org/makingschoolswork/discussionguide.pdf.
The Southern Regional Education Board
(SREB) oversees the High Schools That Work program and provides
reports on schools in participating states with regard to their
progress in meeting High Schools That Work standards. See: http://www.sreb.org/programs/hstw/publications/PubsDisplay.asp
The
Adolescent Brain
The adolescent brain is still under
construction, which has implications for impulse control, planning,
and decision-making (all SEL skills)—and for how we understand
adolescent behavior. Surrounding teens with caring parents, adults,
and institutions while their cognitive development evolves is
crucial. See The Adolescent Brain: A Work in Progress (2005),
Daniel R. Weinberger, Brita Elvevag, Jay N. Giedd at http://www.teenpregnancy.org/resources/reading/pdf/BRAIN.pdf.
New
Books
Inside
High School Reform: Making the Changes that Matter,
by Jordan Horowitz (Wested, 2005) details the turnaround approaches
that are preparing more students for college. Read Horowitz’s
“Top Ten Tips for Improving High Schools” and an interview about
the research that went into the book at www.wested.org/cs/we/view/rs_press/38.
Doing
the Right Thing: Ethical Development Across Diverse Environments:
New Directions fo Youth Development (2006),
No. 108, includes “Promoting children’s ethical development
through social and emotional learning,” by CASEL staff and
associates: Elizabeth Devaney, Mary Utne O’Brien, Mary Tavegia,
and Hank Resnick. http://www.josseybass.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0787985430.html
Smart
and Good High Schools: Integrating Excellence and Ethics for Success
in School, Work, and Beyond (2005).
Thomas Lickona
and Matthew Davidson argue for incorporating good character in high
schools, proposing performance character as the means that
will push students to do their best work (to develop one’s
talents, work hard, and achieve goals in school, work and beyond).
For overview, see http://www.cortland.edu/character/highschool/chapters/SnGReport.pdf.
Emotionally
Intelligent School Counseling,
edited by John Pellitteri, Robin Stern, Claudia Shelton, Barbara
Muller-Ackerman (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006),
includes a chapter entitled “Emotional Networks and Counseling the
High School Student” by Michael T. Daly and John Pellitteri that
articulates the developmental changes and emotional struggles that
coincide with the four years of high school for most students. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0805850341/102-5138440-8988961?v=glance&n=283155
The
Advisory Guide: Designing and Implementing Effective Advisory
Programs in Secondary Schools (2004)
by Rachel A. Poliner and Carol Miller Lieber is a comprehensive
guide that includes 15 different advisory formats and over 130
sample activities organized around 10 advisory themes.
http://www.esrnational.org/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=EOS&Product_Code=W-ADVISO&Category_Code=HS.
And
for a classic book about adolescents… Raising
Emotionally Intelligent Teenagers: Parenting with Love, Laughter,
and Limits, by Maurice J. Elias, Steven E. Tobias,
and Brian S. Friedlander, New York: Harmony Books, 2000.
Grants
Department
of Education Forecast of Funding
This document lists virtually all programs and competitions under
which
the Department of Education has invited or expects to invite
applications
for new awards for FY 2006 and provides actual or estimated deadline
dates
for the transmittal of applications under these programs. http://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/find/edlite-forecast.html
Seeking
Young Heroes for $2,000 Barron Prize
The Gloria Barron Prize for Young Heroes seeks nominations for its
2006
awards. The Barron Prize honors young people ages 8 to 18 who have
shown
leadership and courage in public service to people and our planet.
Nomination deadline is April 30. http://www.barronprize.org/
MetLife
Foundation Bridge Builders Grant
MetLife Foundation Bridge Builders Grant Program and The National
Association of Secondary School Principals is inviting proposals
from
public middle level and high schools serving large numbers of
low-income
students and/or underrepresented minorities (40% or more of the
student
body) to apply for a grant to implement a special initiative aimed
at
building better relationships among adults and students. Maximum
Award:
$5,000. Deadline: April 17, 2006.
http://www.principals.org/s_nassp/sec.asp?CID=568&DID=48228
Free
National & Global Youth Service Day Materials
Materials are available for the 18th Annual National & Global
Youth
Service Day, April 21-23, 2006. Find Planning Tool Kits,
Service-Learning
Curriculum Guides, and Classroom Posters at
http://www.ysa.org/nysd/resource/nysd_resources_parent.cfm
2006 All-USA Teacher Team
USA
TODAY is accepting nominations for the 2006 All-USA Teacher Team, a
recognition program for
outstanding teachers. Maximum
Award:
$2500. Eligibility: Teachers K-12. Deadline: April 29, 2006.
http://allstars.usatoday.com
Unsung
Heroes Awards Program
The ING Unsung Heroes awards program recognizes innovative and
progressive
thinking in education through monetary awards. Maximum Award:
$25,000 to
Grand Prize Winner. Eligibility: full-time educators, teachers,
principals, paraprofessionals, or classified staff members with
effective
projects that improve student learning at an accredited K-12 public
or
private school. Deadline: May 1, 2006.
http://www.ing.com/us/aboutING/communityconnections/ineducation/unsungheroes/001137.html
Butler-Cooley
Excellence in Teaching Awards for 2006
This
award honors teachers who have demonstrated exceptional dedication
and skill in shaping the lives of children and teens through
education. Maximum
award: $5000 cash and travel and lodging expenses to the Turnaround
Management Association conference in Orlando, FL.
Eligibility: primary and secondary school teachers employed
by accredited schools for at least five years.
Deadline: May 1, 2006.
http://www.turnaround.org/about/awards.asp
Grants
to Help Ease the Transition of Students Switching Schools and
Relocating
Awards
will be granted to high school seniors who have demonstrated an
ability to overcome difficulties during their family’s relocation.
Awards are based on an essay (up to 500 words).
Maximum award: $2000. Eligibility: High school seniors
graduating from school this academic year and proceeding to a two-
or-four-year college, and who have relocated in the past five years.
Deadline: May
15, 2006
http://www.parentrelocationcouncil.com/scholarship/application.php
The
NEA Foundation Grants
Grants are provided for the purpose of engaging in high-quality
professional development or implementing creative project-based
learning
that raises student achievement. Maximum Award: $5,000. Eligibility:
public school teachers, public school education support
professionals, and
faculty and staff in public higher education institutions. Deadline:
June
1, 2006.
http://www.neafoundation.org/grants.htm
Grants for Arts, Education, and Health Projects
The Milagro Foundation seeks grants applications from
community-based,
grass-roots organizations that work with underprivileged children
and
youth in the areas of arts, education, and health. Maximum Award:
$5000.
Deadline: N/A.
http://www.milagrofoundation.org/apply.asp
Conferences
National
Coordinating Committee on School Health and Safety.
May 17,
Arlington,
VA. http://www.healthy-students.org
First
International Conference on Community Psychology: Shared Agendas in
Diversity
– June 8-10, San Juan, PR – http://www.cipcad2006.org
National
Mental Health Association
– June 8-10, Washington, DC –
http://www.nmha.org
Community
Schools Conference,
June 14-16, Baltimore Maryland, Renaissance Harborplace Hotel. http://www.communityschools.org
Success
in Sight 2006: Learning, Leading and the Future,
June 14-16, Denver CO. Sponsored by McRel and Teachscape. Speakers
include Bob Marzano, Willard Daggett, Tim Waters, Laura Lefkowitz. http://www.teachscape.com/html/ts/public/html/events/mcrell06.htm.
American
School Counselor Association,
June 24-27, Chicago, IL http://www.schoolcounselor.org
Integrating
Excellence and Ethics 2006 Summer Institute in Character Education
“Strengthening Relationships, Increasing Achievement”
June 26 – 29,
2006, SUNY Cortland, NY, The Centre for the 4th and 5th
Rs
http://www.cortland.edu/character/institutes.htm
Educating Minds and Hearts:
Creating a Climate for Learning,
July 11-14, New York, NY. http://www.csee.net/Summerinstitute.aspx
2006
Annual Youth Leadership Conference “Ethics in Action”
(for students, Grades 9-12), July 13-15, 2006, Salt Lake City,
University of Utah
www.communityofcaring.org.
2006
Community of Caring National K-12 Character Education Conference
July 29 – 31, 2006, Oncenter, Syracuse, New York
www.communityofcaring.org.
Persistently Safe Schools.
September 19-21. Washington,
DC.
http://www.hamfish.org
CSMHA
11th Annual Conference on Advancing School-Based Mental Health
–
September
28-30, Baltimore, MD – http://csmha.umaryland.edu
80th Annual American School Health
Association Conference: Healthy Bodies, Healthy Minds:
The Mental Health Connection – October 11-14, St. Louis, MO
– http://www.ashaweb.org/annual_conferences.html
What
Is CASEL?
CASEL—the
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning—is
dedicated to the development of children’s social and emotional
competencies and the capacity of schools, parents, and communities
to support that development. Based at the University of Illinois at
Chicago (UIC), CASEL is working to create a world in which young
people will have the academic knowledge and skills they need to
achieve their goals and will also be caring, engaged citizens
prepared to participate fully in society. CASEL’s mission is to
establish integrated, evidence-based social and emotional learning (SEL)
from preschool through high school.
What
Is SEL?
Social
and emotional learning (SEL) is the process of developing
fundamental social and emotional competencies or skills in children
and creating a caring and supportive school climate. A large number
of school-based programs and practices are designed to do this. Many
evidence-based school programs that focus on positive youth
development, problem prevention, service-learning, and character
education can be considered SEL. They work to develop students’
social and emotional competencies and create ways to nurture and
support students. The resources in this e-newsletter cover a wide
range of topics under the umbrella of school-based SEL programming.
Collaborative
for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL)
Department of Psychology (M/C 285)
University of Illinois at Chicago
1007 West Harrison St.
Chicago, IL 60607
312-413-1008
Fax 312-355-4480
CASEL@uic.edu
www.CASEL.org
|