March 2006

This e-newsletter is intended to keep you up-to-date on some of the latest SEL research and best practices.  The FCASEL ("Friends of CASEL") listserv manages subscriber information. To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to http://www.casel.org/listservs/index.php or send an e-mail to Cynthia Coleman at  colemanc@uic.edu with “subscribe FCASEL” or “unsubscribe FCASEL” in the subject line. 

We encourage you to share this information with others on your e-mail list. If your e-mail does not support HTML formatting, you can read this issue on our web site at: www.CASEL.org/listservs/enewsletters/e-news-mar06.htm or request a text-only version from Cynthia Coleman at: colemanc@uic.edu.   


In This Issue: Focus on Adolescents 

  • Spotlight on Research: SEL and High School Achievement:  Self-discipline counts more than IQ; Which SEL factors matter most? Social and behavioral characteristics predict academic success; Policies and intervention address problem of bullying; Teacher connectedness and risky behavior; Service-learning and community connections
  • Spotlight on Practice: Keeping kids in school; SEL at the heart of school reform; Turning the tables: teachers as students ~ and students teach about teaching; A whole school turns out to build relationships ~ and student success
  • Spotlight on Policy: New York State mental health/SEL policy 2006; Proposed federal education budget for 2007; Anti-bullying Act of 2005; Policy analysis for mental health in schools
  • Resources: Helpful websites about school reform; Revised educational policies, state-by-state; Data/trends; What Works Clearinghouse new help desk; LSS Partnership Series on Adolescents; Multimedia resource on High Schools that Work; The adolescent brain
  • New Books
  • Grants
  • Conferences

From CASEL's Leadership  

In this issue we turn our attention to the issue of the educational, social, and emotional needs of high school students and the challenges facing educators in helping students to succeed in high school and beyond. Especially in the last year, a great deal of national attention has been directed to these topics. The Gates Foundation’s billion-dollar-plus investment in small high schools, the National Governors Association’s call to action, and the Breaking Ranks II high school reform model are among the most public of the initiatives to improve high schools. Paths to reform and even problem definitions are by no means clear, however. In recent weeks articles in the American School Board Journal and Educational Leadership (www.asbj.com/evs/06/highschool.html and “The Dropout Problem: Losing Ground”, Paul E. Barton, in Educational Leadership (Feb. 2006), Vol. 63, No. 5, pp.14-18 at www.ascd.org) have described a worsening dropout “crisis.” This was followed by a lead article in Education Week titled “The Exaggerated Dropout Crisis,” which estimates the African American student drop-out rate at closer to 25% than the 50% cited by other researchers (Lawrence Mishel, Education Week, Mar. 8, 2006, www.edweek.org). What is not in dispute is that many of our adolescents are hurting. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) latest Youth Risk Behavior Survey reports that, in the previous 12 months, almost 30% of teens “felt so sad or hopeless almost every day for two weeks or more in a row that [they] stopped doing some usual activities,” 13% were in a physical fight on school property, a third were sexually active, and one in six had made a plan to attempt suicide. This crisis among our youth has caught the attention of educators, scholars, funders, and policymakers, who have offered various ideas and initiatives to improve high schools and change the world around adolescents for the better.

Solutions are by no means clear.  Tom Vander Ark, executive director of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s education initiatives, summarized in Education Week last year what had been learned so far in the nation’s largest high school reform effort, their small schools initiative: “The biggest lesson learned to date? It is even harder than we thought to create widespread improvement. My father is a brain surgeon; this is more complicated.”

One of the consistent threads running through the research on improving adolescents’ circumstances and school performance, however, is that social and emotional factors are a key to the solutions. Whether we call it “personalization,”  “student connectedness,” “positive youth development,” “student voice,” or SEL, there is a consistent message in the research. It says that when students know there is an adult in the school who cares about them (caring connection), have a voice in the school’s affairs (opportunities for contribution and responsible behavior), have a positive sense of their own talents and ability to tackle challenges (positive self-awareness), and learn to manage their impulses and complete school tasks (self-management), they are far more likely to 1) literally show up in school, 2) show up with their attention and interest, and 3) succeed academically. In this issue you will learn about this research, other resources on the topic, and strategies you can put into practice to start seeing some of the same results among your own students.

Mary Utne O’Brien
Executive Director


Spotlight on Research 

SEL and High School Achievement

Self-Discipline Counts More Than IQ. In a comparative study of over 300 8th graders, researchers measured the influence of self-discipline and IQ on school success. Results showed that highly self-disciplined adolescents outperformed their more impulsive peers on every academic performance variable. Self-discipline measured in the fall was a better predictor of gains in academic performance over the school year than was IQ. The researchers suggest that in a culture that emphasizes instant gratification, building self-discipline may be the key to success in learning.

Source:  Duckworth, Angela L., and Seligman, Martin E.P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, Vol. 16, No. 12, 939-944.

Which SEL Factors Matter Most? In another report, Theresa Akay examines two factors prominent in SEL discussions: student engagement with school and a student’s sense of his/her own ability to handle academic tasks (the SEL skill of self-awareness). She found that both are significant predictors of school performance, and that of the two, the latter—which she terms “perceived competence”-- is the more influential in boosting achievement in mathematics and reading. That is, students who are confident about their academic competence—who feel they are up to an academic task—do better than students who doubt their ability, even when actual ability is the same for both. The study suggests that the earlier schools and teachers begin to build students’ healthy self-awareness of strengths and confidence in their ability to do well, the better students will perform academically. See Student Context, Student Attitudes and Behavior and Academic Achievement: An Exploratory Analysis, MDRC (Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation), 2006 at http://www.mdrc.org/publications/419/overview.html

Social and Behavioral Characteristics Predict Academic Success

A longitudinal study of 576 students in the Pacific Northwest provides evidence that school-based SEL programs that curb early manifestations of antisocial behavior and promote school bonding and social-emotional skills improve student academic achievement. The researchers found that higher levels of school bonding and better SEL skills in 7th grade strongly predicted academic achievement in 10th grade. See Fleming, Charles B., Haggerty, Kevin P., Catalano, Richard F., Harachi, Tracy W., Mazza, James, J., Gruman, Diana H. (2005). Do social and behavioral characteristics targeted by preventive interventions predict standardized test scores and grades?  Journal of School Health, Vol. 75, No. 9.

Policies and Intervention Address Problem of High School Bullying

A representative national sample of US teenagers surveyed last year revealed that two-thirds have been verbally or physically harassed or assaulted during the past year because of their perceived or actual appearance, gender, sexual orientation, gender expression, race/ethnicity, disability, or religion. The authors of this report note that the pervasiveness of negative comments about gayness, for example, challenges schools to enact anti-harassment policies and teachers to establish a learning environment safe for all. See GLSEN’s report From Teasing to Torment: School Climate in America (2005) at http://www.glsen.org/cgi-bin/iowa/all/news/record/1859.html.

Teacher Connectedness and Risky Behavior

Data collected from a sample of 550 adolescents in juvenile detention facilities was analyzed to explore the relationship between their reported sense of connectedness with teachers and their risk-taking behaviors. Those who reported less teacher connectedness were twice as likely to use drugs, twice as likely to be sexually active and to have sex while using drugs than teens who felt greater connection. The researchers conclude that school-based interventions that enhance the school environment, particularly teachers’ skills and training to maximize the effectiveness of their student interactions, may be an important strategy for reducing risky adolescent behaviors.

Source:  Voisin, Dexter R., Salazar, Laura F., Crosby, Richard, Diclemente, Ralph, Yarber, William, Staples-Horne, Michelle. Teacher connectedness and health-related outcomes among detained adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Health (Oct. 2005), Vol. 37, Issue 4.

Service-Learning and Community Connections

We at CASEL often talk about service learning as a wonderful opportunity for students to act on and build their social and emotional skills—an important “action step” of SEL. We were excited to read news of service-learning integrated into an academic high school program in Hawaii, resulting in a host of good outcomes: positive student academic outcomes and career development, as well as greater attachment to the community, along with benefits to the community and environment. Students rotated through four different service-learning projects each semester. Evaluation results showed that, compared to peers not involved in service learning, the students engaged in service learning were more likely to feel that they contributed to the community, were valued by community members, had responsibility for the welfare for the community, had pride in the community, and took action and made changes in their community.

Source:  Yamauchi, Lois A., Billig, Shelley H., Meyer, Stephen, Hofshire, Linda. Students outcomes associated with service-learning in a culturally relevant high school program, Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community,(2006), Vol. 32, pp. 149-164.

Don't miss a research brief on SEL and Service-Learning is available from CASEL, LSS, and ECS, Making the Case for Social and Emotional Learning and Service-Learning (2003) at http://ecs.org/clearinghouse/44/04/4404.pdf.


Spotlight on Practice

Keeping Kids in School

The Silent Epidemic: Perspectives of High School Dropouts, 2006, by John M. Bridgeland, John J. DiIulio, Jr., and Karen Burke Morison, at http://www.civicenterprises.net/pdfs/thesilentepidemic3-06.pdf, offers insights into reasons why students leave school early as well as solutions to the dropout crisis. This innovative study went to the former students themselves in pursuit of answers and found some surprises. Only 35% of former students cited academic failure as a major factor in dropping out (and most of these said that their school hadn’t done all that they could to help them). The large majority, however, identified social and emotional barriers to continuing in school. They pointed to problems of engagement and motivation, lack of caring relationships in school, and lack of personal support. Building off these responses, the authors suggest supports that can be provided within the school environment and at home to improve students’ chances of staying in school:

  • Improve teaching and curricula to make school more relevant and engaging and enhance the connection between school and work
  • Improve instruction and access to supports for struggling students
  • Build a school climate that fosters academics by increasing supervision and classroom discipline
  • Ensure that students have a strong relationship with at least one adult in the school
  • Improve communication between parents and schools

In a separate but related report, Paul E. Barton examines the statistics behind the failure to graduate, the factors that affect the dropout rate (low-income and single-parent family, getting low grades in school, being frequently absent, and changing schools), and programs that successfully support students at risk of dropping out. Providing support for vulnerable ninth-graders and one-on-one interaction between students and adults throughout high school is key. See The Dropout Problem: Losing Ground, in Educational Leadership (Feb. 2006), Vol. 63, No. 5, pp.14-18 (www.ascd.org)

SEL at the Heart of School Reform

Numerous reports and articles have appeared recently about school reform in middle and high schools. Some support lessons CASEL has learned about implementation; others identify structures that CASEL has also found to be valuable, such as freshman academies and close teacher-student relationships. Three valuable resources are:

Works in Progress: A Report on Middle and High School Improvement Programs (2005) addresses key challenges in middle and high schools, such as literacy, violence, prevention, and transitions. Programs are recommended, as well as a commitment to faithful implementation, willingly executed, time for success to grow, and support and engagement from the entire learning community. Comprehensive School Reform Quality Center (AIR) (www.csrq.org/docs/WorksinProgressReport_web.pdf)

Breaking Ranks II: Strategies for Leading High School Reform (2004) and the just-released, Breaking Ranks in the Middle: Strategies for Leading Middle Level Reform (2006), are products of the National Association of Secondary School Principals and the Education Alliance at Brown University. The documents establish strategies and recommendations for high school and middle level education to improve the performance of students and better equip them for high school and beyond. Three core areas of practice are emphasized as key to successful reform, and concrete strategies for addressing each are provided. The core areas are: 

  • Collaborative leadership and professional learning communities
  • Personalizing the school environment
  • Making learning personal: Curriculum, instruction and assessment

The personalization strand in both books—defined as strengthening relationships among people in the school community to improve student performance—is simply different language for social and emotional learning strategies designed to build student connection and engagement. These excellent resources are available at http://www.principals.org.

Mosaic: An EDC Report Series, Focus on High School (Fall 2005) focuses on the challenge to revamp high schools so that more students graduate by nurturing both the intellectual and social development of students, building relevance and connectedness into the curriculum and into training for teachers. (http://main.edc.org/Mosaic/Mosaic10/toc.asp and http://main.edc.org/Mosaic/Mosaic10/introduction/asp)

Turning the Tables: Teachers as Students—and Students Teach about Teaching

In My Year as a High School Student, Educational Leadership (March 2006), Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 63-65 (www.ascd.org), Deborah Waldron, a high school physics teacher, describes taking a year-long freshman biology class. Apart from acquiring a newfound appreciation of biology, she learned new ways to improve her teaching by becoming more aware of the real pressures that students experience:

  • Give students more time for creative projects
  • Occasionally use short, straightforward assessments
  • Reinforce ethics and clarify plagiarism
  • Change student seats often so everyone gets to know the whole class

In the Best Practices Club at Lexington High School, (Massachusetts), students are trained to critique classes. The idea of this collaboration between students and teachers to create a better learning environment is spreading to other schools across the country. To learn more, visit the Best Practices website at www.bestpracticeslex.org and read Ariela Rothstein’s article in Education Week (Feb. 8, 2006), Students as Coaches: One High School’s Experiment in Using Students’ Perceptions to Help Teachers Improve Instruction at http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2006/02/08/22rothstein.h25.html?querystring=Students%20as%20Coaches&levelId=1000.

The Boston Plan for Excellence, the local education fund, set out to assess the quality of relationships among faculty and students in Boston schools. Students were enlisted as researchers and their findings about improving school climate are published. Recommendations are to:

  • Make a serious effort to know every student well so they will feel supported and motivated to learn
  • Expose students to role models and programs that help them recognize their potential
  • Create opportunities for students to really learn about classmates’ cultures to help reduce negative peer interaction
  • Create a clean, well-maintained physical environment to help students feel ownership of their school

To read about the findings and the process in order to involve students in your school, go to: http://snipurl.com/bostonsurvey.

A Whole School Turns out to Build Relationships ~ and Student Success

An ambitious pilot program in Lancaster High School (TX) teams every senior with a mentor, who might be a teacher or instructional aide, a secretary, or an administrator. Mentors meet with their student at least once every six weeks to discuss college plans, entrance exams, TAKS (the state tests required for graduation), and opportunities for tutoring. Already this year, 33% more students have passed the necessary TAKS tests than last year, and the mentoring program is getting credit for this; plans are being made to expand the program to other high school grades. All Seniors in Texas High School Get Mentors, Sean Cavanagh, in Education Week, Feb. 22, 2006 (www.edweek.org).  

See Safe and Sound: An Educational Leader's Guide to Evidence-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) Programs (http://www.casel.org/projects_products/safeandsound.php) for information on a number of excellent SEL programs with high school components, including Community of Caring, Lions-Quest Skill Series, and Teenage Health Teaching Modules.

Practice idea: For the high school teachers among our readers who want to "try" SEL, here's a suggestion. One way to personalize the classroom and to promote social and emotional learning is to offer choices from day one. First, choices convey that there isn't just one way to meet a goal or complete a task, thus acknowledging that every class exhibits a wide range of learning preferences, styles and motivators. Second, choices encourage self-efficacy and self-expression. Students get to say to themselves, "I chose to do it this way and here's why." Third, providing more opportunities for choice comes with the expectation of being more personally responsible and accountable.  And finally, offering academic and behavioral choices invites cooperation, reduces student resistance to learning, and minimizes adversarial relationships between students and teachers.
 
Talk with colleagues and develop ways to offer students more individual and group choices in areas including assessment, test-taking, homework, what they want to learn more about, what they want to learn how to do, the topics of study in a particular unit, the sequence of learning units, the amount students need to read each week, and procedures for how things are done in class. (For more detailed ideas, see pages 46-48 and 103-105 in Partners in Learning by Carol Miller Lieber (2002), published by Educators for Social Responsibility.)  If you try these suggestions and want to tell us how things went for you and your students, we want to hear about it!  Write to Mary Utne O'Brien at muobrien@uic.edu.  We look forward to hearing from you!


Spotlight on Policy  

New York State Mental Health/SEL Policy, 2006

Here in Illinois, we feel that the Illinois’ Children’s Mental Health Act of 2003, which led to the creation of SEL standards for all students, is something of a miracle—a major benchmark in the education establishment’s attention to SEL. So we are thrilled to report that legislators in New York have proposed a similar act based on the Illinois legislation. Proposed Bill A9649 would require establishment of a children’s mental health plan and incorporation of social and emotional development standards into elementary and secondary school educational guidelines. http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A09649&sh=t  

Proposed Federal Education Budget for 2007

The President’s proposed education budget for 2007 is 5.5% less than 2006, and would eliminate 42 education programs, such as vocational education, after-school programs, Perkins Loans, career and technical education, school counseling, and Safe and Drug-Free Schools through the reduction to Title 1 grants by $3 billion. See http://www.stateline.org/live/ViewPage.action?siteNodeId=136&languageId=1&contentId=86486 for details. Public Education Network (http://www.publiceducation.org/doc/press_releases/FY2006_Comments.doc) contends that this proposed budget undermines existing federal school reform efforts that have instituted serious accountability measures. A state-by-state look at educational funding can be found at http://www.nea.org/lac/fy07edfunding/index.html.  

Anti-Bullying Act of 2005

 

Building on the safe school legislation already in place, the new proposed bill (HR 284) requires schools and districts to include discipline policies against bullying and harassment; establish complaint procedures for students and parents; and annually notify parents of new anti-bullying policies and procedures. (http://www.bullypolice.org/national_law.html)

Policy Analysis for Mental Health in Schools

The recent findings released in the SAMHSA report: School Mental Health Services in the United States, 2002-2003 are given a context in The Current Status of Mental Health in Schools: A Policy and Practice Analysis, published by the UCLA School Mental Health Project. Read the report at: http://smhp.psych.ucla.edu/currentstatusmh.htm.


Resources  

Helpful Websites about High School Reform

Center for Comprehensive School Reform: www.centerforcsri.org

Comprehensive School Reform Quality Center: www.csrq.org

Edutopia on High Schools: http://www.edutopia.org/highschool/

Wested Website on Secondary School Improvement, Schools Moving Up:  http://www.schoolsmovingup.net/cs/wested/print/htdocs/home.htm

Revised Educational Policies, State-by-State

All education-related policies enacted by states over the past year are at your fingertips. Read, for example, how states articulate Character Education Policy or High School Drop-out Rates, at http://www.ecs.org/ecs/ecscat.nsf/Web2005All?OpenView&Count=-1

Data/Trends

The US Department of Education reports that 73.9% of American high school students graduated in four years for the class of 2002-03, with a range from 59.6% for Washington, DC, to 87% for New Jersey.  See The Averaged Freshman Graduation Rate for High Schools, from Common Core of Data, 2001-02, 2002-03, at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006601 for this and other useful data.

The Education Commission of the States (ECS) regularly issues useful compilations and comparisons of state policies and data collected on a wide variety of topics. To view information about high schools, standards, requirements, state data systems, and other related topics, go to: http://www.ecs.org/ecsmain.asp?page=/html/educationIssues/ECSStateNotes.asp.

A Profile of the American High School Seniors in 2004: A First Look provides an array of demographic data and information about the plans, expectations, and views of education from these recent graduates of the American educational system at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006348.

What Works Clearinghouse New Help Desk

Launched in January 2006 under the auspices of the US Department of Education’s Institute of Education, the Help Desk serves to provide policymakers, practitioners, and researchers with practical, easy-to-use resources to advance evidence-based education, particularly for program implementation and evaluation. http://www.whatworkshelpdesk.ed.gov/

LSS Partnership Series on Adolescents

LSS’s Partnership Series includes four concise brochures about adolescence written for parents and teachers. See “The ABCs of Coping with Adolescence” and “The Four Ls of Building Adolescent Identity” at www.temple.edu/lss/partnerships.htm.

Multimedia Resource: Discussion Guide and DVD of “Making Schools Work > High Schools That Work”

This PBS Special aired in October 2005 and highlighted ways schools of all levels are addressing school improvement by adopting attitudes and programs for change. http://www.pbs.org/makingschoolswork/sbs/hstw/index.html

A discussion guide is now available free-of-charge; a DVD of the broadcast can be purchased.  They are designed to stimulate public discussion of effective techniques and successful examples of school change. See the guide and ordering information at www.pbs.org/makingschoolswork/discussionguide.pdf.

The Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) oversees the High Schools That Work program and provides reports on schools in participating states with regard to their progress in meeting High Schools That Work standards. See: http://www.sreb.org/programs/hstw/publications/PubsDisplay.asp

The Adolescent Brain

The adolescent brain is still under construction, which has implications for impulse control, planning, and decision-making (all SEL skills)—and for how we understand adolescent behavior. Surrounding teens with caring parents, adults, and institutions while their cognitive development evolves is crucial. See The Adolescent Brain: A Work in Progress (2005), Daniel R. Weinberger, Brita Elvevag, Jay N. Giedd at http://www.teenpregnancy.org/resources/reading/pdf/BRAIN.pdf.


New Books  

Inside High School Reform: Making the Changes that Matter, by Jordan Horowitz (Wested, 2005) details the turnaround approaches that are preparing more students for college. Read Horowitz’s “Top Ten Tips for Improving High Schools” and an interview about the research that went into the book at www.wested.org/cs/we/view/rs_press/38.

Doing the Right Thing: Ethical Development Across Diverse Environments: New Directions fo Youth Development (2006), No. 108, includes “Promoting children’s ethical development through social and emotional learning,” by CASEL staff and associates: Elizabeth Devaney, Mary Utne O’Brien, Mary Tavegia, and Hank Resnick. http://www.josseybass.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0787985430.html

Smart and Good High Schools: Integrating Excellence and Ethics for Success in School, Work, and Beyond (2005). Thomas Lickona and Matthew Davidson argue for incorporating good character in high schools, proposing performance character as the means that will push students to do their best work (to develop one’s talents, work hard, and achieve goals in school, work and beyond). For overview, see http://www.cortland.edu/character/highschool/chapters/SnGReport.pdf.

Emotionally Intelligent School Counseling, edited by John Pellitteri, Robin Stern, Claudia Shelton, Barbara Muller-Ackerman (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006), includes a chapter entitled “Emotional Networks and Counseling the High School Student” by Michael T. Daly and John Pellitteri that articulates the developmental changes and emotional struggles that coincide with the four years of high school for most students. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0805850341/102-5138440-8988961?v=glance&n=283155

The Advisory Guide: Designing and Implementing Effective Advisory Programs in Secondary Schools (2004) by Rachel A. Poliner and Carol Miller Lieber is a comprehensive guide that includes 15 different advisory formats and over 130 sample activities organized around 10 advisory themes. http://www.esrnational.org/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=EOS&Product_Code=W-ADVISO&Category_Code=HS.

And for a classic book about adolescents… Raising Emotionally Intelligent Teenagers: Parenting with Love, Laughter, and Limits, by Maurice J. Elias, Steven E. Tobias, and Brian S. Friedlander, New York: Harmony Books, 2000.


Grants  

Department of Education Forecast of Funding
This document lists virtually all programs and competitions under which
the Department of Education has invited or expects to invite applications
for new awards for FY 2006 and provides actual or estimated deadline dates
for the transmittal of applications under these programs. http://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/find/edlite-forecast.html

Seeking Young Heroes for $2,000 Barron Prize
The Gloria Barron Prize for Young Heroes seeks nominations for its 2006
awards. The Barron Prize honors young people ages 8 to 18 who have shown
leadership and courage in public service to people and our planet. Nomination deadline is April 30. http://www.barronprize.org/

MetLife Foundation Bridge Builders Grant
MetLife Foundation Bridge Builders Grant Program and The National
Association of Secondary School Principals is inviting proposals from
public middle level and high schools serving large numbers of low-income
students and/or underrepresented minorities (40% or more of the student
body) to apply for a grant to implement a special initiative aimed at
building better relationships among adults and students. Maximum Award:
$5,000. Deadline: April 17, 2006.
http://www.principals.org/s_nassp/sec.asp?CID=568&DID=48228

Free National & Global Youth Service Day Materials
Materials are available for the 18th Annual National & Global Youth
Service Day, April 21-23, 2006. Find Planning Tool Kits, Service-Learning
Curriculum Guides, and Classroom Posters at
http://www.ysa.org/nysd/resource/nysd_resources_parent.cfm

2006 All-USA Teacher Team

USA TODAY is accepting nominations for the 2006 All-USA Teacher Team, a recognition program for outstanding teachers. Maximum Award: $2500. Eligibility: Teachers K-12. Deadline: April 29, 2006. http://allstars.usatoday.com

Unsung Heroes Awards Program
The ING Unsung Heroes awards program recognizes innovative and progressive
thinking in education through monetary awards. Maximum Award: $25,000 to
Grand Prize Winner. Eligibility: full-time educators, teachers,
principals, paraprofessionals, or classified staff members with effective
projects that improve student learning at an accredited K-12 public or
private school. Deadline: May 1, 2006.
http://www.ing.com/us/aboutING/communityconnections/ineducation/unsungheroes/001137.html

Butler-Cooley Excellence in Teaching Awards for 2006

This award honors teachers who have demonstrated exceptional dedication and skill in shaping the lives of children and teens through education.  Maximum award: $5000 cash and travel and lodging expenses to the Turnaround Management Association conference in Orlando, FL.  Eligibility: primary and secondary school teachers employed by accredited schools for at least five years.  Deadline: May 1, 2006. http://www.turnaround.org/about/awards.asp

Grants to Help Ease the Transition of Students Switching Schools and Relocating

Awards will be granted to high school seniors who have demonstrated an ability to overcome difficulties during their family’s relocation.  Awards are based on an essay (up to 500 words).  Maximum award: $2000. Eligibility: High school seniors graduating from school this academic year and proceeding to a two- or-four-year college, and who have relocated in the past five years.  Deadline:  May 15, 2006 http://www.parentrelocationcouncil.com/scholarship/application.php

The NEA Foundation Grants
Grants are provided for the purpose of engaging in high-quality
professional development or implementing creative project-based learning
that raises student achievement. Maximum Award: $5,000. Eligibility:
public school teachers, public school education support professionals, and
faculty and staff in public higher education institutions. Deadline: June
1, 2006.
http://www.neafoundation.org/grants.htm

Grants for Arts, Education, and Health Projects
The Milagro Foundation seeks grants applications from community-based,
grass-roots organizations that work with underprivileged children and
youth in the areas of arts, education, and health. Maximum Award: $5000.
Deadline: N/A.
http://www.milagrofoundation.org/apply.asp


Conferences

National Coordinating Committee on School Health and Safety. May 17, Arlington, VA. http://www.healthy-students.org

First International Conference on Community Psychology: Shared Agendas in Diversity – June 8-10, San Juan, PR – http://www.cipcad2006.org

National Mental Health Association – June 8-10, Washington, DC – http://www.nmha.org

Community Schools Conference, June 14-16, Baltimore Maryland, Renaissance Harborplace Hotel. http://www.communityschools.org

Success in Sight 2006: Learning, Leading and the Future, June 14-16, Denver CO. Sponsored by McRel and Teachscape. Speakers include Bob Marzano, Willard Daggett, Tim Waters, Laura Lefkowitz. http://www.teachscape.com/html/ts/public/html/events/mcrell06.htm.

American School Counselor Association, June 24-27, Chicago, IL http://www.schoolcounselor.org

Integrating Excellence and Ethics 2006 Summer Institute in Character Education
“Strengthening Relationships, Increasing Achievement”
June 26 – 29, 2006, SUNY Cortland, NY, The Centre for the 4th and 5th Rs
http://www.cortland.edu/character/institutes.htm

Educating Minds and Hearts: Creating a Climate for Learning, July 11-14, New York, NY. http://www.csee.net/Summerinstitute.aspx

2006 Annual Youth Leadership Conference “Ethics in Action”
(for students, Grades 9-12), July 13-15, 2006, Salt Lake City, University of Utah
www.communityofcaring.org.

2006 Community of Caring National K-12 Character Education Conference
July 29 – 31, 2006, Oncenter, Syracuse, New York
www.communityofcaring.org.

Persistently Safe Schools. September 19-21. Washington,
DC. http://www.hamfish.org

CSMHA 11th Annual Conference on Advancing School-Based Mental Health September 28-30, Baltimore, MD – http://csmha.umaryland.edu

80th Annual American School Health Association Conference: Healthy Bodies, Healthy Minds: The Mental Health Connection – October 11-14, St. Louis, MO – http://www.ashaweb.org/annual_conferences.html


What Is CASEL?  

CASEL—the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning—is dedicated to the development of children’s social and emotional competencies and the capacity of schools, parents, and communities to support that development. Based at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), CASEL is working to create a world in which young people will have the academic knowledge and skills they need to achieve their goals and will also be caring, engaged citizens prepared to participate fully in society. CASEL’s mission is to establish integrated, evidence-based social and emotional learning (SEL) from preschool through high school.

What Is SEL?

Social and emotional learning (SEL) is the process of developing fundamental social and emotional competencies or skills in children and creating a caring and supportive school climate. A large number of school-based programs and practices are designed to do this. Many evidence-based school programs that focus on positive youth development, problem prevention, service-learning, and character education can be considered SEL. They work to develop students’ social and emotional competencies and create ways to nurture and support students. The resources in this e-newsletter cover a wide range of topics under the umbrella of school-based SEL programming.


Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL)
Department of Psychology (M/C 285)
University of Illinois at Chicago
1007 West Harrison St.
Chicago, IL 60607
312-413-1008
Fax 312-355-4480 
CASEL@uic.edu 
www.CASEL.org