Guidelines
for Effective SEL Implementation
CASEL Guidelines
CASEL Practice
Rubric for School-Wide SEL Implementation: In this rubric, the
steps, phases, and ongoing sustainability factors are explained
and charted so that progress can be assessed throughout the process
of implementation.
Ten Guidelines for SEL
Programming: CASEL’s original articulation
of 10 components of effective SEL practice, from which the rubric
and text developed. Short and comprehensive.
CASEL Guides and Books
Sustainable schoolwide social
and emotional learning (SEL): Implementation guide
and toolkit: CASEL’s step-by-step guide and 40 tools
take school leaders and stakeholder teams through the process of
planning for and accomplishing the changes needed for sustainable
SEL including creating a vision, assessing needs, choosing programs,
integrating SEL into academic subjects, evaluating outcomes, conducting
professional development, and communicating with families and the
community.
Patti, J., & Tobin, J. (2003). Smart school leaders: Leading with emotional intelligence.
Iowa: Kendall Hunt. CASEL Founding Leader Janet Patti and her colleague describe what leaders must do to lead and model social
and emotional learning-focused schools.
Elias, M.J., Arnold, H., & Steiger C. (Eds.) (2002). EQ+IQ: Best leadership practices for caring and successful
schools. Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, CA. CASEL Founding Leader Maurice Elias and colleagues provide a variety of
examples of schools that work with SEL.
Novick, B., Kress, J.S, Elias, M.J. (2002). Building learning communities with character: How to integrate academic,
social, and emotional learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. The chapters in
this book ingeniously reflect and model the form of a typical SEL meta-cognitive problem-solving model, e.g., Ch.3: Recognize
feelings: Know when to start problem solving; Ch.4: Identify problems: Look at the current situation; Ch.5: Set goals: Focus
the change efforts; Ch. 6: Generate options: Think of many things to do; and so on
Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Frey, K. S., Greenberg, M. T., Haynes, N. M., Kessler, R., Schwab-Stone, M. E.,
& Shriver, T. P. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. Alexandria, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development. The original CASEL book that started the field of SEL, this ASCD publication is filled
with implementation advice and case-study examples.
Other Implementation Guides
Safe, supportive, and successful schools: Step by step stresses the importance of addressing the social and emotional needs of all students in a school, as well as the additional needs of children who require more support, and it provides specific guidance for doing so in a coordinated way. It uses a pyramid with three tiers to describe student populations with different social and emotional needs. The book leads schools through the process of planning and funding and contains numerous checklists, surveys, and tools to aid schools with each step in the process. , (e.g., see the "Schoolwide Prevention Program Checklist." The guide also includes a matrix and descriptions of evidence-based programs.
Getting to outcomes 2004: Promoting accountability
through methods and tools for planning, implementation, and evaluation presents a ten-step process that enhances practitioners' prevention skills while empowering them to plan, implement, and evaluate their own programs. While designed for substance use prevention, GTO can also be useful for prevention efforts targeted at other youth behavior problems. This freely downloadable manual includes a variety of student, parent, and teacher surveys in addition to planning tools.
Voices of Experience: Factors
Influencing SEL Implementation and Sustainability
A model for implementing and sustaining schoolwide social and emotional
learning (2008). Ji, P., Axelrod, J., Foster, C., Keister, S., O'Brien, M.U., Ogren, K., and Weissberg, R.P. The
Community Psychologist, 41(2), 39-42.
This paper presents data from a pilot sample of 84 schools who used the CASEL rubric to assess their current level of SEL
implementation. Schools rated themselves on each of the ten steps and six sustainability factors specified in the CASEL model.
The paper then describes how schools can use the rubric to advance the implementation of their schoolwide SEL programming.
Implementation, sustainability, and
scaling up of social-emotional and academic innovations in public schools (2003). Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Graczyk, P. A.,
& Weissberg, R. P. School Psychology Review 32(3), 303-319.
Based on experiences of CASEL and reviews of literature, the reasons why some schools fail to expand and sustain
their SEL efforts are discussed, along with steps schools can take to help avoid these common pitfalls.
Voices from the field: Identifying and
overcoming roadblocks to carrying out programs in social and emotional learning/emotional intelligence Elias, M.J., Bruene-
Butler, L., Blum, L., & Schuyler, T. (2000). Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 11(2), 253-272.
How to launch a
social and emotional learning program Elias, M.J., Bruene-Butler, L., Blum, L., and Schuyler, T. (1997). Educational
Leadership, 54(8), 15-19.
The attitudinal and logistical roadblocks that educators initiating SEL programs commonly face—and how they can be
overcome.
Schoolwide and District SEL Case Studies:
SEL Implementation Research
The study of
implementation in school-based preventive interventions: Theory, research, and practice (Draft Final Report, 2005) Greenberg,
Domitrovich, Graczyk, & Zins, Center for Mental Health Services.
This report introduces a broad conceptual model of
implementation for school-based prevention programs that includes discussion of both the factors that affect implementation and
the need for implementation quality monitoring; reviews barriers and suggest strategies that practitioners and researchers can
use to improve implementation quality; and discusses the implications of implementation issues for program developers,
researchers, trainers, practitioners, and policymakers.
Current and future challenges in
school-based prevention: A researchers perspective
Greenberg, M.T. (2004). Prevention Science, 5(1).
The paper presents six future directions for research in the field of school-based prevention and health promotion. The
directions include developing new programs and models, developing standards and accountability systems related to school success,
moving from efficacy to effectiveness research, understanding factors influencing program integration, broad dissemination of
programs and policies, and the sustainability of programs, policies, and community partnerships.
Examining the role of implementation quality in
school-based prevention Using the PATHS curriculum. Kam, C., Greenberg, M. & Walls, C. (2003). Prevention
Science. 4(1): 55-63.
Describes a study of six inner-city schools which found that schools with high
levels of principal support were more than twice as likely to see improvements
in students' socio-emotional competence, aggressive behavior, and behavioral
dysregulation than schools with low principal support when implementing a delinquency
prevention program. A good report on how principal support and implementation
quality are intertwined and equally important in successful SEL implementation.
The study of implementation: Current findings
from effective programs that prevent mental disorders in school-aged children Domitrovich, C.E., & Greenberg, M.T.
(2000). Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 11(2), 173-296.
See also two special issues of the Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 11(1&2) on the
Implementation of Prevention Programs:
- Implementation of prevention programs
11(1)
For a short overview of the articles in this issue, read: Increasing implementation success in prevention programs (Zins, J.E., Elias, M.J., Greenberg, M.T. &
Pruett, M.K.)
- Measurement of quality of implementation of prevention programs 11(2)
For a short overview of the articles in this issue, read: Promoting quality implementation in prevention programs (Zins, J.E., Elias, M.J., Greenberg, M.T., &
Pruett, M.K.)
|